It may be technically easy to make a car drive on its own,
but eventually they have to deal with complex social interactions like hand
signals, head nods, horns, or even road rage. We humans, as their ultimate end
users, and fellow road users, are too diverse, complex, and unpredictable in
our behaviour and that's true with our driving habits as well. Dr. Melissa
Cefkin, a design anthropologist working at the Nissan Technical Center in
Silicon Valley, is given with a 'simple' task - teaching self-driving cars how
to behave responsively to the human interactions on roads through novel
semaphore systems.
Dr. Cefkin's is in charge of the research into the complex
web of human-machine interaction, within and outside the vehicle, and in the
context of the broader culture. He prime research questions remains to be “how
many regularities and universalities are there in human behavior, or is there
just kind of infinite variation?”
The project takes an empirical look at what happens in
shared spaces (such as roads) between and among humans and vehicles, so as to
decode certain patterns of interaction. These insights can aid the research and
development of autonomous cars that are going to be a big technological
breakthrough in the years to come. The responsive driving manners of robotic
cars have direct impacts on two most important objectives behind these cars -
reliable automation of manual driving and enhanced road safety, thereby
eliminating plausible human errors committed on roads. The core tools of anthropological
research such as individual and group interviews, charted observation, and
codified ethnographic videography are used in order to decipher patterns of interactions
that can be fed into the decision chains of self-driving cars.
Interestingly, some of their research findings apparently
reflect the key challenges that autonomous vehicles face on roads. Since these
cars are basically designed for efficiency and lack self-thinking as any other
machines, they generally tend to be conformists to road rules. For instance, at
traffic signals and regulated road intersections, robotic cars do fairly well
as their human counterparts.
However at abstruse road situations like that of a typical
Old Delhi streets, their driving can be confounding. Cefkin, at an interaction
with Brett Berk of Drive.com, says that there are push and pull factors, varied
interpretations of what stopping means and in what order it should occur or
cease at 'artifacts' like stop sign where people have to make conscious
decisions of what they want to do.
Further, she observes that there seems to be a predominant
preference for maintaining some sort of movement and flow, with respect to
pedestrians, skateboarders and scooterers on American roads and sidewalks, akin
to Newton’s Law of Inertia. "There is a very subtle selection of pathways
and routes that they use to avoid interaction requirements—places where they’re
going to have to stop and figure out, okay, what do I do”, she says. As
expected, machines may find it hard to predict such dynamic and enigmatic human
expressions that are subtle and sudden. Bicyclists are perfect example for
Cefkin. “Bicycling is a whole social movement. It’s a cause. It’s a
mission—there are activists in this arena”, she adds.
In every such encounters, non-verbal signs such as head
nods, hand signals, horn honks, headlight flashing, and terse expressions implying
annoyance or violence exist in communications between road users. So as to make
self-driving cars to imitate such means, Melissa Cefkin is assisting Nissan to
come up with some sort of modern semaphore systems. Case in point are
color-coded lights that might let proximate human drivers know of the car’s
intent to start, stop, or stay in place. Light-eye strips may track their
movement, alerting them to the vehicle’s surveillant awareness of their
presence. And a text panel could flash directional messages like “After You,”
and “Please Wait".
Moreover, this kind of an anthropological approach leads us
to further questions. Do automated cars bring any alternative and more physical
experiences in moving through time and space, interacting with surroundings and
environment? Do they add anything into the relationship between the outside and
the inside, and what people might be doing and experiencing as they move
through space driven by cars on their own? Liberated from the need to drive, or
from the division between driver and passenger, can robotic cars help bring the
outside in, or facilitate a more shared experience?
Dr. Melissa Cefkin, a design anthropologist, at Nissan Tech Center |
“The trend of being cloistered in our own worlds and living
in a bubble through our communication devices, there’s no reason to think that
automatically or magically changes with autonomous vehicles,” Cefkin says. “But
occasionally I hear of people getting themselves off social media
intentionally, or investigating social movement niches like sustainability and
the search for new collective forms of economic and social interaction,” she
says positively.
After all, automakers are interested in the insights
anthropologists can bring into how people are using their products and the
experiences they create. This is very much true with the 'driver-less' cars
that are fast evolving, as the term does not mean 'people-less' cars. A
critical understanding of road interactions and driving realities that are fundamentally human and therefore 'social', in addition to the symbolism
involved, is essentially in building a reliable self-driving car.
HT and Photo Credit: DRIVE.COM
Comments
Post a Comment